Questioning the universe | Stephen Hawking

By | October 14, 2019


There is nothing bigger
or older than the universe. The questions
I would like to talk about are: one, where did we come from? How did the universe come into being? Are we alone in the universe? Is there alien life out there? What is the future of the human race? Up until the 1920s, everyone thought the universe
was essentially static and unchanging in time. Then it was discovered
that the universe was expanding. Distant galaxies were moving away from us. This meant they must have been
closer together in the past. If we extrapolate back, we find we must have
all been on top of each other about 15 billion years ago. This was the Big Bang,
the beginning of the universe. But was there anything
before the Big Bang? If not, what created the universe? Why did the universe emerge
from the Big Bang the way it did? We used to think
that the theory of the universe could be divided into two parts. First, there were the laws like Maxwell’s equations
and general relativity that determined the evolution
of the universe, given its state
over all of space at one time. And second, there was no question
of the initial state of the universe. We have made good progress
on the first part, and now have the knowledge
of the laws of evolution in all but the most extreme conditions. But until recently,
we have had little idea about the initial conditions
for the universe. However, this division into laws
of evolution and initial conditions depends on time and space
being separate and distinct. Under extreme conditions,
general relativity and quantum theory allow time to behave
like another dimension of space. This removes the distinction
between time and space, and means the laws of evolution
can also determine the initial state. The universe can spontaneously
create itself out of nothing. Moreover, we can calculate
a probability that the universe was created in different states. These predictions
are in excellent agreement with observations by the WMAP satellite
of the cosmic microwave background, which is an imprint
of the very early universe. We think we have solved
the mystery of creation. Maybe we should patent the universe and charge everyone royalties
for their existence. I now turn to the second big question: are we alone, or is there
other life in the universe? We believe that life arose
spontaneously on the Earth, so it must be possible for life
to appear on other suitable planets, of which there seem to be
a large number in the galaxy. But we don’t know how life first appeared. We have two pieces
of observational evidence on the probability of life appearing. The first is that we have fossils of algae
from 3.5 billion years ago. The Earth was formed 4.6 billion years ago and was probably too hot
for about the first half billion years. So life appeared on Earth within half a billion years
of it being possible, which is short compared
to the 10-billion-year lifetime of a planet of Earth type. This suggests that the probability
of life appearing is reasonably high. If it was very low,
one would have expected it to take most
of the ten billion years available. On the other hand, we don’t seem
to have been visited by aliens. I am discounting the reports of UFOs. Why would they appear
only to cranks and weirdos? If there is a government conspiracy
to suppress the reports and keep for itself the scientific
knowledge the aliens bring, it seems to have been a singularly
ineffective policy so far. Furthermore, despite an extensive search
by the SETI project, we haven’t heard any alien
television quiz shows. This probably indicates
that there are no alien civilizations at our stage of development within a radius
of a few hundred light years. Issuing an insurance policy against abduction by aliens
seems a pretty safe bet. This brings me to the last
of the big questions: the future of the human race. If we are the only intelligent
beings in the galaxy, we should make sure
we survive and continue. But we are entering an increasingly
dangerous period of our history. Our population and our use
of the finite resources of planet Earth are growing exponentially, along with our technical ability
to change the environment for good or ill. But our genetic code still carries the selfish
and aggressive instincts that were of survival
advantage in the past. It will be difficult enough
to avoid disaster in the next hundred years, let alone the next thousand or million. Our only chance of long-term survival is not to remain inward-looking
on planet Earth, but to spread out into space. The answers to these big questions show that we have made remarkable progress
in the last hundred years. But if we want to continue
beyond the next hundred years, our future is in space. That is why I am in favor of manned — or should I say,
personned — space flight. All of my life I have sought
to understand the universe and find answers to these questions. I have been very lucky that my disability has not been
a serious handicap. Indeed, it has probably given me
more time than most people to pursue the quest for knowledge. The ultimate goal is a complete
theory of the universe, and we are making good progress. Thank you for listening. Chris Anderson: Professor,
if you had to guess either way, do you now believe
that it is more likely than not that we are alone in the Milky Way, as a civilization of our level
of intelligence or higher? This answer took seven minutes,
and really gave me an insight into the incredible act of generosity
this whole talk was for TED. Stephen Hawking: I think it quite likely
that we are the only civilization within several hundred light years; otherwise we would have heard radio waves. The alternative is that civilizations
don’t last very long, but destroy themselves. CA: Professor Hawking,
thank you for that answer. We will take it
as a salutary warning, I think, for the rest of our conference this week. Professor, we really thank you
for the extraordinary effort you made to share your questions with us today. Thank you very much indeed. (Applause)

100 thoughts on “Questioning the universe | Stephen Hawking

  1. Phillip Christou Post author

    Artificial intelligence right here

    Reply
  2. Angeline worldwide. Post author

    Earth developed when fossiles appered from dinoures.

    Reply
  3. Angeline worldwide. Post author

    So people was creathed from that .

    Reply
  4. miodrag perisic Post author

    hawkins is god for me i work on google chrome is it possible my text so badly translated

    Reply
  5. DURMUŞ BAYSAL Post author

    It is Allah who erected the heavens without pillars that you [can] see. (The Noble Quran. Surah Ar Rad. Verse 2)
    And the heaven We constructed with strength, and indeed, We are [its] expander. (Surah Adh Dhariyat. Verse 47)
    And it is He who created the night and the day and the sun and the moon; all [heavenly bodies] in an orbit are swimming. (Al Anbya. Verse 33)
    Have they not seen that We set upon the land, reducing it from its borders? (Surah Ar Rad. Verse 41)
    And you see the mountains, thinking them rigid, while they will pass as the passing of clouds. [It is] the work of Allah, who perfected all things. (Suran An Naml Verse 88)
    It is Allah who has created seven heavens and of the earth, the like of them. (Surah Talaq. Verse 12)
    Indeed, your Lord is Allah, who created the heavens and earth in six days and then established Himself above the Throne. He covers the night with the day, [another night] chasing it rapidly; and [He created] the sun, the moon, and the stars, subjected by His command. Unquestionably, His is the creation and the command; blessed is Allah, Lord of the worlds.
    (The Noble Quran. Surah Al Araf Verse 54)
    Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, and We separated them and made from water every living thing? Then will they not believe?(Surah Al Anbya Verse 30)
    And it is He who created the heavens and the earth in six days – and His Throne had been upon water – that He might test you as to which of you is best in deed. But if you say, "Indeed, you are resurrected after death," those who disbelieve will surely say, "This is not but obvious magic."(Surah Al Hud. Verse 7)
    And if whatever trees upon the earth were pens and the sea [was ink], replenished thereafter by seven [more] seas, the words of Allah would not be exhausted. (Surah Luqman. Verse 27)

    Perhaps in the future irradiation (teleportation) may be possible. There were many technologically advanced people in the old tribes. But they were destroyed because of their sins. Here's proof.
    [Solomon] said, "O assembly [of jinn], which of you will bring me her throne before they come to me in submission?"
    A powerful one from among the jinn said, "I will bring it to you before you rise from your place, and indeed, I am for this [task] strong and trustworthy."
    Said one who had knowledge from the Scripture, "I will bring it to you before your glance returns to you. (The Noble Quran. Surah An Naml. Verse 38-40)

    Listen to the voice of the Noble Quran.
    Maybe your life will be changed If God allows.
    Really amazing
    French : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVY8pwx9B74
    English: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Omh4oG8T_Fw
    German: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXWTxB6oS6I

    Reply
  6. samantha Rodrigues Post author

    R.I.P you were and still are the smartest person i know of in this couple decades thank you for the smarts people need now a days R.I.P

    Reply
  7. Mohammed Hossain Post author

    Stephen Hawking was worried about future of human race . But nothing to worry because Prof. Hawking probably forgotten "Universal Law of Conservation of Total Energy from the very beginning of the Early Universe. " Means nothing is created or can be created nor can be destroyed or will get destroyed in future. Only changes in forms and contents in all existences occurred, will occur in future Dinusours got extinct .Human race may get extinct over large period of time
    It is most fundamental property of Nature from the very beginning of Big Bang . Natural evolution and Natural Extinction can never be escaped any way. Those are ever continuous processes prevailing everywhere in the Universe in all existances. So nothing to worry , today we are human tomorrow will become atoms in other forms of existance. But we are not lost rather will change to other forms and content in other existence ,we will remain within our beloved Universe. Nothing is destroyed or can be destroyed by any fictitous Super Natural So called God literally. It is Universal Law of Universe followed at all stages of changes.One can term it as absolute law of Nature .

    Reply
  8. Mohammed Hossain Post author

    I learned many things from his written book "A brief History of Time ." I am much indebted to Prof. Dr.Stephen Hawking., a great silent genious ever lived on earth in our time. He is successful to complete his life cycle worthily as Physicists .I have all honours due to him in my heart.Peace be upon Prof Stephen Hawking .

    Reply
  9. Jim Karkaloutsos Post author

    Stephen Hawking was wrong. THERES IS GOD. HE CREATEDTHE UNIVERSE. IT CANNOT, HAS NOT CREATED ITSELF. GOD DID! I think Hawking had it way wrong because he is a God hater

    Reply
  10. Dilek Ulutaşkın Post author

    Moris'i güzide 'den kurtarmıştık ,kadın pençelerini bi geçirdi yavrum morise neyseki sabricim 'o bi bacak açıyor bi yıllık parasını kazanıyor sen bunu kaldırabilcek misin '?dedirttik de kurtardık oğlumuzu …
    Özledim lan seni muhabbet olsun diye yazdım ,sen de ne var ne yok ?

    Reply
  11. Dilek Ulutaşkın Post author

    Sen tanıdığım en gerizekalı yaratıksın

    Reply
  12. hvv lsn Post author

    Altyazi problemi var durdurup tekrar oynatinca altyazi kayboluyor.

    Reply
  13. Dilek Ulutaşkın Post author

    Kimsiniz siz ne özelliğiniz var kimsiniz siz
    Siiiiiiz kimsiniz kim ????

    Reply
  14. Joe Leamy Post author

    I will never meet the man who made me an amateur astronomer and gave me a deep passion of astronomy

    Reply
  15. Al Bernerhelge Post author

    if we'd put a nice beat under his voice, we have a great techno song of the early 90s.
    #U96dasBoot

    Reply
  16. Marcos Charles Post author

    What are all the noises in the background? And I don't mean his chair noises, I heard a ladies voice say something about baby. 4:32

    Reply
  17. Greg Thomson Post author

    "And God said, let there be light…"
    That would absolutely make a big bang.

    Reply
  18. metalrave Post author

    A bit of a tear hit my eye when he spoke of his disability. He was thankful and gracious to continue educating and pursuing knowledge..and here ,most of us are just taking things for granted..thank you dr hawking

    Reply
  19. Melchizedek Selelo Post author

    Watch coming video answering hawking’s big questions by Melchizedek( Behind the sin)

    Reply
  20. Pele sch Post author

    oh come on we all know it was a computer talking and Stephen was just a puppet it used so we would listen to it 🙂
    But seriously , so many great minds are leaving us , i don't see anyone replacing them , this is scary

    Reply
  21. M. Bilal Post author

    Expanding of Universe , Separation of Earth and The Heavens by Big Bang , the Orbits of Earth Moon and the Sun in which they are revolving in the Milky Way Galaxy , Lowest land on earth where Persia defeated Rome , the Geo-Spherical shape of the earth , the reflection of Sun's Light on the Moon , the growth of a baby between the Ribs and the Back Bone , the two streams of Sea flowing in their separate Flow with out any physical or visual Barrier , the preservation of Firoun and many many more Secrets or Universe were Revealed in Quran over 1400 Years ago ..
    Quran is the only book with zero Contradictions and Miracles which are both Scientific and Historical …
    the tries to Prove that all this is come from None , when there is a Simple Sum 0+0+0 cannot possibly ever give you 1. Don't let your last Day be the First Day when you Realize what your life Really Means .
    Read.
    Read..

    Reply
  22. petrica977 Post author

    So this person, all his life, told a STORY, about what happend 14 billion years ago. Never saw a black hole, never saw the inside of an atom, all theory. How is that diferent from religion?

    Reply
  23. sln78 Post author

    He’s probably the best person to have ever lived who proved there’s nothing called disability. Everyone except him would have broken down in his condition and would have spent the entire life on bed. Greatest inspiration forever. He’s put everyone to shame

    Reply
  24. Tony K Post author

    Wow, the start of this made me realize that this man is using ONLY energy to make himself heard.(sitting only looking at screen} and i thought that, it is not the inventor of the means for this to be possible by his invention (which is BRILLIANT) but the fact that the possibility already existed !! but that the inventor only found the way. So maybe everything is possible. Not sure I agree with all his ideas tough. Peace out.

    Reply
  25. Dewadatta Avasare Post author

    There are more comments criticising people who are making fun of Hawking than actual comments making fun of hawking

    Reply
  26. Nabh Chandra Post author

    I don't see any negative comments here. What i see are the comments of people who are talking about the negative comments. Wtf

    Reply
  27. Mona Bowley Post author

    We didn't deserve you. It deeply saddens me knowing we will never meet in this life. But you were someone for me to aspire to be like, no matter how unlikely.

    Reply
  28. Tabula Rasa Post author

    "our only hope for survival is to spread out into space". Loren Eiseley, explained the unlikely, perhaps impossibility of 'space travel/colonization occurring in his thought provoking work, 'THE INVISIBLE PYRAMID'.
    All the dreamers and curious will find his reasoning why this cannot happen, if they will read the chapter titled, 'Our Cosmic Prison'.His reasoning is compelling & supported by irrefutable scientific realities.

    Reply
  29. Kay Best Post author

    I have always wanted to listen to this speaker Thank you ?? Ted Talks I’m a late bloomer with something’s I’ve seen this professional but I be never thought ? to truly take time and focus on the information like I am willing and able to now in my life I will not look past the comment next to mines because it already warned there were ignorance so I am focusing on the message again ?

    Reply
  30. Sarah Menkes Post author

    In one week it will have been one year since the death of Stephen Hawking. Looking at the state of the world now, I can say without a doubt that the universe was much better when he was still alive. I truly wish that if he were to somehow come back to life Stephen would be proud of us, but it seems like that cannot be the case. I presume Stephen would agree that we would all be better if we stopped insulting scientists in YouTube comments. Make the world a better place. Stop trying to offend dead people.

    Reply
  31. M L Post author

    God is dead. Life is nasty and brutish. There is life throughout our galaxies, throughout our universes. Multiverse. No hereafter no afterlife. Life's a losing proposition; not a dress rehearsal. Darwinism. Survival of fittest. Weak are meat strong do eat. Adapt or die. Superman ain't coming. God's dead.

    Reply
  32. Helicopter Parenting Post author

    "Time is an alternate dimension of space." Imgoingnuts

    Reply
  33. Mohamed Post author

    It's a nonsensical idea that something can come from nothing.

    Reply
  34. wayne harris Post author

    I think its norrow minded of humans to think that any other intelligent life would have evolved as we have there are endless posabilities of evalution why think they even would emit such things as radio waves or even need light to see or even see at all if any thing i would like to think if there is any life out there that it was not like us at all.

    Reply
  35. Carlo Gambino Post author

    The Utterly transcendent God is , without any partners. He has no sharers in His essence, attributes, actions, or rulings. He is the sole Creator of all that exists, has existed, and will ever exist. Everything other than Him is His creation – that is, a contingent being that came into existence after it did not previously exist.

    He alone controls all events, causes, and effects, and no power exists independently of His power. Nothing happens outside of His will, neither before He willed it, nor after He willed it, neither more than what He willed, nor less than what He willed.

    There is nothing like Him, and it is impossible to imagine or conceive Him. He is not qualified by the laws of His creation. He is not encompassed by direction or distance. The Utterly transcendent God existed as He has always been before the creation of time and space.He not only created time and space, but He is transcendentally beyond them, such that He cannot be “in” a place, He cannot be “everywhere,” and He cannot be “nowhere.”

    The Utterly transcendent God is the eternally-existing, necessary first cause. Unlike His creation, which is a possible existent subject to nonbeing, beginning, and ending, The Utterly transcendent God has no beginning and He will never perish or come to an end. Scholars have also explained, “Bringing creation into existence did not add anything to His attributes that was not already there.”

    He is the Sustainer of everything, directly sustaining every instant of the existence of all things. He alone gives life and He alone gives death, and He will re-create and resurrect living rational beings for judgment and retribution just as He created them the first time. Nothing is difficult for Him.

    His omnipotence encompasses all things intrinsically possible. He cannot terminate His own existence, for “the divine nature necessarily entails the divine perfections, of which being is one. It is impossible that The Utterly transcendent God could cease to have this perfection or any other, for otherwise He would not be God. Similarly, it is impossible for created things to contravene the knowledge or speech of The Utterly transcendent God , for by being connected with either of these two divine attributes, it has become contingently necessary for any created thing to conform and submit.

    His knowledge encompasses all things. It is not subject to change or increase; it is not based on time or chronology. He knew the actions and eternal abodes of all of humanity before its creation, and its actual existence and conformity to The Utterly transcendent God’s pre-temporal knowledge neither increased nor benefited Him.

    He sees all events and things in a manner wholly unlike our means of seeing things. His sight does not depend on distance, light, and appendages. Likewise, He hears all events and things with a hearing that transcends sound waves, volume, tone, and pitch.

    Reply
  36. buck Newton Post author

    If there was a cool people hall of fame Steven hawking would be the first inductee

    Others you would have to include are George Carlin, Hugh Hefner, Larry Flint, Jesse Ventura, Sheldon from the Big Bang Theory, Tom green just to name a few

    Reply
  37. Ray Post author

    I accidently paused the video and was just sitting there waiting for him to carry on speaking ??‍♂️

    Reply
  38. Harry Potter Post author

    I feel sorry for steavan because God loves him even if he doesn’t believe in God but I believe god made the earth 100% real because there can not be any evedece that we came from monkeys or any on that nonsense. In the beginning God made the heavens and the earth and first man from dust Genesis 1:1

    Reply
  39. Syed mdabdullah Post author

    Negative comments 2%
    Positive comments 1%
    Comments against negative comments 96.7 %
    Others 0.3%

    Reply
  40. Xxx Campos Post author

    The man was handicap he couldn't
    Even talk doesn't that tell you anything

    Reply
  41. Nick Friend Post author

    …Stagnation caused the Big Bang. Yin-Yang one cannot survive or exist without the other.

    Reply
  42. K 1 Post author

    How do we respond when prominent scientists like Stephen Hawking write books propound atheism like the grand design?

    Answer: We should respond with scientific skepticism.

    Not everything that scientists speak is science. When Stephen Hawking is a respected scientist. He one of the prominent physicist in the world and he is also a person who is inspiring in a way he has conquered over his physical inabilities. As a human being, as a scientist he can be respected, but beyond that when a person speaks about things that are beyond one’s jurisdiction then we cannot grant undue trustworthiness or authority to them, just because is a person expert in finances. He is good in share market, what shares to invest and what shares is to not invest. That person doesn’t become an expert in say diseases diagnoses. If I have a stomach pain, just because a person is expert in diagnosing the trends in shares that doesn’t mean that the person’s advice will be authoritative when the person is talking about claiming to analyze or diagnose stomach pain. Or if person caught a serious diseases like cancer, that person cannot give treatment based on expertise in some other field. Same way scientists may have expertise in their fields but God is outside their field.

    When Stephen Hawking is writing a book like “Grand Design”, he is not writing as a scientist. He is writing as a metaphysician. He is trying take up the role of a philosopher and he is making philosophical statements. He is completely out of depth in his philosophy. He is not a philosopher at all. We should not give a credibility that comes from science and from his stature of scientist to his book. If he writes a book on theoretical physics which is his specialty, on black hole which is a specialty, that is fine. But this is not his field. So he is not authority. Because he is not a authority he ends up making all sorts of logical blunders which are often go to the point of being ludicrous. For example, right in the beginning he says that these questions are initially considered to be in domain of philosophy but philosophy is dead now because it is not kept up with the progress in science and therefore the questions has to be answered by science. Well philosophy is far from dead. In his own university philosophy department is there and there are thousands of philosophers in the world. This sort of arrogant dismissive of another respected field is not indicative of a objective mindset that wants to do reasonable inspection. And paradoxically, after declaring death of philosophy, what Stephen Hawking does throughout his book is philosophize. For example, when he states that because there is a law of gravity, the universe will create itself out of nothing. Even little bit of training in philosophy which also brings training in logic. Even little bit of training in logic would have helped him to recognize the logical fallacy. It’s not absurdity in the statement. Once you are saying on one side because there is a law of gravity. Law of gravity is obviously something and then the universe will create itself out of nothing. What is it? Is it something law of gravity or is it nothing? Here he creates a logical blunder by equating nothing with the law of gravity. I have also answered in another question that whenever scientists propose or atheists propose most specifically to explain how everything came out of nothing they have to redefine nothing so that it is something and quite a lot of things that is. In this case he has at least done that with the law of gravity. The law of gravity, where has it come from? That he does not explain. Even if he is assumes that the law of gravity is there, laws are simply modes that describe how things happen. Laws are not causes and laws are not definitely creators. If a batsman hits a ball, the law of motion will describe how the trajectory by which the ball will go to the boundary. But the law of motion does not hit the ball and law of motion does not definitely create the ball, the bat and the batsman. Ascribing these kind of powers to a law of nature is actually a pure fiction. Basically what he does is that he transfers omnipotence from God to the laws of nature. This book “Grand Design” when it was published, a Mumbai newspaper, the Mumbai Mirror decided to do a review and they approached different representatives of different religions. So for Hinduism they approached me. My response was also published in the news paper. Basically I wrote the same point that Hawking assumes that laws of nature existed before the universe. He simply substitutes God with the laws of physics. But now we see that laws of physics organize intelligence. Laws do not come about by themselves and laws do not act. Laws are simply modes that describe how things happen.

    Another statement if we see, “the universe can and will create itself from nothing”. Now when we say universe will create itself. What does this mean? The idea that something can create itself if we say that, that means to create it has to exist before itself. How can it exist before itself? This is a logical absurdity. Like this the book is filled with logical absurdities. Basically in attempt to prove that there is no designer behind the universe, basically he makes the laws of nature which cannot be causes also, what to speak of creators, into God. He asks us to have faith in that and he is basically making a religion centered on faith and laws of nature. Off course he is not the founder of this religion. There are many atheistic scientists who have been espousing this religion before him but the only difference is that he is abusing his scientific authority to give credibility and to demand faith in this religion, which is wrong. This book is simply not a scientific book , it’s a philosophical book. Although it may use scientific terminology, it may talk about m- theory, gravity and many scientific terms which may intimidate common people but the basic argument which he is making is first of all, not scientific. It’s a philosophical argument and even in the philosophical argument, it is not a sound philosophical argument. It collapses when it is subjected to serious logical scrutiny.

    How the laws of nature act? God acted, Krishna lifted Govardhan hill. He says the laws of nature acted and this happened. Basically the laws of nature are having miraculous potencies. The m- theory according to him. Its like a begetter, it creates. It’s like a creative force. It’s a prime mover. It existed before it started moving and then it is everywhere, it is nowhere. It has omniscience, it has omnipresence, it has omnipotence. Does it remind you of somebody? Basically it is just a substitute for God. It is not a logically satisfying substitute also. We shouldn’t get disturbed or beguiled by atheists claiming atheism as being scientifically credibile by abusing the scientific authority for that. Non sense remains non sense even if it is spoken by people who have a lot of credibility otherwise in their own respective fields. Their credibility in other fields does not make the nonsense sense when they are speaking nonsense in fields which are not in their specialization. Thank you.

    Read more https://www.thespiritualscientist.com/2014/05/how-do-we-respond-when-prominent-scientists-like-stephen-hawking-write-books-propounding-atheism/

    Reply
  43. Austyn Cotton Post author

    He's dead still finds away to make us laugh and get smarter

    Reply
  44. diarykeeper Post author

    He had alot to tell. Too bad people suck at listening.

    Reply
  45. Chakkara Kp Post author

    I stopped when he said universe can come in to being out of nothing..i respect his point of view but simply i cant see the logic there

    Reply
  46. Biology Backbone Post author

    “And the heaven We created with might, and indeed We are (its) expander.” (Quran 51:47)

    Expanding of Universe is mentioned in Holy Quran. What scientists have discovered recently GOD mentioned it 1400 years ago…..

    Reply
  47. Akshat Bhatt Post author

    If u are in peace, who cares how big is universe and how it is created, isnt this unnecessary worrying??

    Reply
  48. samarhafeez Post author

    There is ofcourse something bigger and greater than the universe And it's called God

    Reply
  49. samarhafeez Post author

    – Creator of the heavens and the earth from nothingness, He has only to say when He wills a thing, “Be,” and it is.(2- The heifer, 117) Holy Qur'an

    Reply
  50. Bang Arang Post author

    I think what we know of Steven Hawking now is nothing more than Hawkings wife and closest people around him not letting there money bag stop producing after his disease took hold. Really think about it in reality. It is torture but most woman are okay with torturing men and or children now for financial gains. That is sadly the reality of the world now.

    Reply
  51. J T Post author

    How does he explained the soul and imagination and ideals?

    Reply
  52. Dipesh Ghimire Post author

    When I was in class 5 and first time I was known about the universe and its indefinite size; i started to imagine that if nothing had existed then what would happen nothing; no earth ,no sun, no solar system, no universe and no anything; this thought always made my head burst out; I couldn't control my mind and thought; Nowadays sometime even this thought comes and I try to deviate my thought to other path; Even nowadays if I think like that my mind burst out…..????

    Reply
  53. Julio Jesus Jimenez Post author

    ''There is nothing bigger or older than the Universe''… WHAT AN OPENING LINE !
    This means that Science (reasoning) debunks Religions (faith),
    that SH was an atheist, that no Gods exist, that Gods are man-made concepts.

    Reply
  54. Kumsal Yağmur Post author

    First of all, my English is not very good. That's why I can make mistakes when I write. That's really amazing, science. Mysterious and impressive as a treasure waiting to be discovered. And if we find this treasure, we're gonna get more than we can imagine. Humanity is about to disappear and become worse because of a civilization that destroyed it. Humanity is on a crashed plane, and science will make us wing. We can only rise with science and develop with science. So we all need help, we don't have to be scientists, even teacher fashion designers can change the world. If people want to do something, everything is in our hands, and that's my purpose. If I'm a high school student, my goal is not to change with life, but to change the world. And he needs everybody …

    Reply
  55. Quote Goat Post author

    While this great man is talking, I am embarrassed to see all my apartment neighbors bowing and praising to Indian god Vinayaka… We are the only atheists in town

    Reply
  56. Quote Goat Post author

    My middle finger to everyone who can't respect this great man

    Reply
  57. Sai Re1th Post author

    Greatest Mind….. I think that word isn't enough for Professor Hawking ……How can a Human is such Intelligent……..I think He is a Super Human

    Reply
  58. ahmad farhan Post author

    Someone who can't explore the world by himself, let alone told you about the universe. And you believe it, excellent!

    Reply
  59. Gary Brown Post author

    I wonder if he would have used musk’s design for electronics that hook up to the human brain.

    Reply
  60. Daniel Hill Post author

    What a man such wisdom and intellect. My question is If the the universe is infinite then surely there are infinite possibilities. But i suppose like Hawking has said surely that would mean that there is life out there in the far universe no?

    Reply
  61. Memento Catharsis Post author

    "Civilizations tend to destroy themselves quickly and that is why we have not heard from them"

    Reply
  62. Phong Vong Post author

    It is too far for Steve to bring you an apple to your office. I tell you. Tell you…I I I I I I I tell you.

    Reply
  63. Phong Vong Post author

    President Times A Lesson . Patrolling Too high. Is what i truely to once illstrating indead to only the acquaincy. Physics. Stupid. Dump. Physics don't talk . You are so yes big. Physics. Point poke joke oh yeah Physics.

    Reply
  64. Ralph Stgermain Post author

    Someone forgot to show him a mirror, he calls everyone a crank or weirdo. It's not all cranks and weirdos dead Steve, there are a total variation of mankind, from Reagan, to military pilots, to people who had no advantage or desire to come forward because weirdos like you would ridicule them

    Reply
  65. Ima Clown- Post author

    Wait how does he talk like like that I am confused what

    Reply
  66. KJV 예수쟁이 Post author

    (KJV)(Hebrews 9:27) And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment

    (KJV)(Revelation 21:8) But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers,
    and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
    (KJV)(Mark 9:44) Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched-

    Reply
  67. KJV 예수쟁이 Post author

    (KJV)(Psalms 14:1) To the chief Musician, A Psalm of David. The fool hath said in his heart, There

    is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
    (KJV)(Job 4:17) Shall mortal man be more just than God? shall a man be more pure than his maker?
    (KJV)(Romans 6:23) For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord-

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *